Erythromycin and azithromycin are administered differently, impacting their pharmacokinetic profiles. Erythromycin, typically given orally or intravenously, boasts a shorter half-life, necessitating more frequent dosing. Its bioavailability varies significantly depending on the formulation; enteric-coated tablets offer improved absorption compared to immediate-release forms. Intravenous administration bypasses this issue, providing predictable serum concentrations.
Azithromycin, conversely, exhibits a much longer half-life, enabling once-daily dosing regimens. It also demonstrates excellent tissue penetration, accumulating in various sites of infection, such as the lungs and prostate. This characteristic allows for shorter treatment courses compared to erythromycin. Oral bioavailability is generally high and relatively consistent across formulations.
Dosage adjustments are sometimes necessary for patients with renal or hepatic impairment. For erythromycin, reduced dosages may be required to prevent toxicity. Azithromycin dosage adjustments are usually less significant but should be considered based on the degree of impairment. Always consult prescribing information for specific recommendations.
Monitoring for adverse effects is important. Gastrointestinal disturbances, such as nausea and diarrhea, are common with both drugs. Prolonged QT interval is a known risk with erythromycin, particularly higher doses, so ECG monitoring might be warranted in high-risk individuals. Azithromycin carries a lower risk of this complication. Patient education regarding potential side effects and prompt reporting of any concerning symptoms is vital.


